'outstanding IP chambers'
Legal 500 2008
'Top drawer IP set.'
Legal 500 2010
'A veritable powerhouse of IP expertise'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'clerking team that exhibits 'perfect communication''
Legal 500 2008
'Practical and helpful clerks" provide a "smooth and personable service.'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'excellence on IT matters'
Legal 500 (Information Technology) 2010
'A number of great IT and telecoms barristers.'
Legal 500 2010
'An incredibly good set for IP matters'.
Legal 500 2010
'8 New Square successfully parlays its renowned IP expertise into success in the IT sector.'
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2009
Buhler AG -v- FP Spomax [2008] EWHC 823 (Ch)
Case Summary | Judgment | 21 April 2008
A patent infringement and validity case heard in February 2008, regarding a patent for a new 'double roller' grinding process method of milling flour for starch. The Defendant alleged that the patent was invalid for obviousness. The Judge held that the patent was obvious. Andrew Lykiardopoulos appeared on behalf of the successful Defendant.