'clerking team that exhibits 'perfect communication''
Legal 500 2008
'A veritable powerhouse of IP expertise'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'excellence on IT matters'
Legal 500 (Information Technology) 2010
'An incredibly good set for IP matters'.
Legal 500 2010
'Practical and helpful clerks" provide a "smooth and personable service.'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'8 New Square successfully parlays its renowned IP expertise into success in the IT sector.'
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2009
'outstanding IP chambers'
Legal 500 2008
'Top drawer IP set.'
Legal 500 2010
'A number of great IT and telecoms barristers.'
Legal 500 2010
Actavis v Novartis [2009] EWHC 41 (Ch)
Case Summary | Judgment | 16 January 2009
The trial, held in July 2008, was about a European Patent for a sustained release formulation of a drug called fluvastatin, a type of statin which reduces blood cholesterol. Actavis sought to revoke the patent on the grounds of obviousness and insufficiency. Novartis did not defend the claims as granted but applied to amend. The main issue in the trial was whether the invention was obvious in light of all the difficulties associated with attempting to make a controlled release formulation. The Judge held that, despite the problems associated with successfully formulating controlled release fluvastatin, the invention was still technically obvious and as such patent was obvious over the common general knowledge but allowed the amendments proposed by Novartis. Mark Chacksfield appeared as junior counsel for Novartis.

