'An incredibly good set for IP matters'.
Legal 500 2010
"8 New Square brims with barristers experienced in fighting fiendishly complex, high-value IT and telecoms disputes."
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2014
"Fantastic roster of talent" and recommended for being "very modern, forward-thinking and providing sound commercial advice" as well as offering instructing solicitors "a very broad skill set in the soft IP space."
Chambers & Partners 2017
"8 New Square brims with barristers experienced in fighting fiendishly complex, high-value IT and telecoms disputes."
Chambers & Partners 2014
'A number of great IT and telecoms barristers.'
Legal 500 2010
'Top drawer IP set.'
Legal 500 2010
'Practical and helpful clerks" provide a "smooth and personable service.'
Chambers and Partners 2011
"There are great people there at all levels and the clerks are very accommodating."
Chambers & Partners (Intellectual property) 2014
"an impressive set with quality from the top
silk down to the most junior barristers."
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2013
'A veritable powerhouse of IP expertise'
Chambers and Partners 2011
"8 New Square is undoubtedly one of the leading sets for trade mark and copyright cases within the media and entertainment sphere, so much so that stablemates here frequently find themselves pitted against each other in major cases."
Chambers & Partners (Media & Entertainment) 2014
'excellence on IT matters'
Legal 500 (Information Technology) 2010
The clerks are described as "helpful," "generous" and "very good at knowing what you want."
Chambers & Partners (Intellectual Property) 2013
R v MAFF ex parte Monsanto PLC, intervener Clayton Plant Protection Ltd Case C-306/98
Case Summary | Judgment | 3 May 2001
EC Directive on agrochemical products - Authorisation of generics. Judicial review proceedings concerning the validity of the grant under Directive 91/414/EEC of an agrochemical product licence to a generic producer. The ECJ upheld the validity of the grant of the generic licence under the transitional provisions of the Directive. Earlier proceedings in the Queen's Bench Divisional Court concerning interim relief are reported at [1998] 4 All ER 321; [1999] FSR 223; the Divisional Court accepted undertakings proffered by Clayton to keep its sales under the disputed licence below ceiling figures until the case was dealt with by the ECJ.