'Practical and helpful clerks" provide a "smooth and personable service.'
Chambers and Partners 2011
The clerks are described as "helpful," "generous" and "very good at knowing what you want."
Chambers & Partners (Intellectual Property) 2013
'excellence on IT matters'
Legal 500 (Information Technology) 2010
'Top drawer IP set.'
Legal 500 2010
"There are great people there at all levels and the clerks are very accommodating."
Chambers & Partners (Intellectual property) 2014
"8 New Square is undoubtedly one of the leading sets for trade mark and copyright cases within the media and entertainment sphere, so much so that stablemates here frequently find themselves pitted against each other in major cases."
Chambers & Partners (Media & Entertainment) 2014
'A number of great IT and telecoms barristers.'
Legal 500 2010
"8 New Square brims with barristers experienced in fighting fiendishly complex, high-value IT and telecoms disputes."
Chambers & Partners 2014
'A veritable powerhouse of IP expertise'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'An incredibly good set for IP matters'.
Legal 500 2010
"Fantastic roster of talent" and recommended for being "very modern, forward-thinking and providing sound commercial advice" as well as offering instructing solicitors "a very broad skill set in the soft IP space."
Chambers & Partners 2017
"8 New Square brims with barristers experienced in fighting fiendishly complex, high-value IT and telecoms disputes."
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2014
"an impressive set with quality from the top
silk down to the most junior barristers."
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2013
Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd & Ors v Asda Stores Ltd (Rev 1) [2014] EWCA Civ 1294
Case Summary | Judgment | 15 October 2014
James Mellor QC recently appeared on behalf of Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd & Others in this appeal against an order for revocation of Specsavers’ overlapped ellipses wordless trade mark. Charlotte May QC acted for the Registrar of Trade Marks as an intervener.
Following references to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Appeal found that the use of the shaded logo mark, comprising the word “Specsavers” against the background of two overlapping ovals redolent of a pair of glasses, also constituted genuine use of the wordless trade mark comprising the overlapping ovals alone. The evidence showed that the wordless mark identifies goods and services to the average consumers as those of Specsavers. In other words, the wordless logo mark is perceived as a trade mark and not simply as a background.
The Court of Appeal emphasised the exceptional circumstances of the case and that in general it is unlikely that the background of a mark will be perceived by the average consumer as an indication of origin. The appeal was allowed and the trade mark was not revoked.
James Mellor QC was instructed by HGF Law and Charlotte May QC was instructed by the Treasury Solicitor.