












'A number of great IT and telecoms barristers.'
Legal 500 2010
'An incredibly good set for IP matters'.
Legal 500 2010
"8 New Square brims with barristers experienced in fighting fiendishly complex, high-value IT and telecoms disputes."
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2014
"Fantastic roster of talent" and recommended for being "very modern, forward-thinking and providing sound commercial advice" as well as offering instructing solicitors "a very broad skill set in the soft IP space."
Chambers & Partners 2017
"8 New Square is undoubtedly one of the leading sets for trade mark and copyright cases within the media and entertainment sphere, so much so that stablemates here frequently find themselves pitted against each other in major cases."
Chambers & Partners (Media & Entertainment) 2014
'A veritable powerhouse of IP expertise'
Chambers and Partners 2011
The clerks are described as "helpful," "generous" and "very good at knowing what you want."
Chambers & Partners (Intellectual Property) 2013
'Top drawer IP set.'
Legal 500 2010
"8 New Square brims with barristers experienced in fighting fiendishly complex, high-value IT and telecoms disputes."
Chambers & Partners 2014
"an impressive set with quality from the top
silk down to the most junior barristers."
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2013
"There are great people there at all levels and the clerks are very accommodating."
Chambers & Partners (Intellectual property) 2014
'excellence on IT matters'
Legal 500 (Information Technology) 2010
'Practical and helpful clerks" provide a "smooth and personable service.'
Chambers and Partners 2011
Evegate Publishing Limited v Newsquest Media (Southern) Limited [2013] EWHC 1975 (Ch)
Case Summary | Judgment | 10 July 2013
John Baldwin QC and Isabel Jamal recently appeared in the High Court for the successful defendant in Evegate Publishing Limited v Newsquest Media (Southern) Limited [2013] EWHC 1975 (Ch). The case concerned the publishing of a farming newspaper by the defendant, initially called ‘Southern Farmer’ and later called ‘The Southern Farmer’. The claimant alleged that the title of the defendant’s newspaper amounted to passing off of their magazine title and trade name ‘South East Farmer’ and infringement of their UK figurative trade mark comprising the words ‘South East Farmer’. The defendants sought revocation of the trade mark, and/or a declaration that it was invalid for periodicals, magazines and newspapers that were not related solely to farming and agricultural matters in the South East of England.
With regard to the passing off claim, although the judge held that the claimant’s magazine title and trade name had some limited goodwill, she concluded that the evidence of confusion did not show sufficient misrepresentation to constitute passing off. The inherent descriptiveness in the names resulted in a greater degree of discrimination from the public such that no damage had occurred and there was no risk of it occurring. Accordingly she dismissed the passing off claim.
Similarly with regard to the trade mark infringement claim, the judge held that in the circumstances there was no risk that the average consumer would be confused, or that they would make a link between the marks, and further the judge rejected the 10(3) trade mark infringement claim. She also held that, in any event, the defendant’s use of the mark fell within the s.11(2)(b) defence. She thus also dismissed the trade mark claims.
Finally the judge rejected the claims for invalidity of the mark, holding that the trade mark had acquired distinctiveness through use.