'An incredibly good set for IP matters'.
Legal 500 2010
'clerking team that exhibits 'perfect communication''
Legal 500 2008
'A number of great IT and telecoms barristers.'
Legal 500 2010
'Top drawer IP set.'
Legal 500 2010
'outstanding IP chambers'
Legal 500 2008
'8 New Square successfully parlays its renowned IP expertise into success in the IT sector.'
Chambers & Partners (Information Technology) 2009
'Practical and helpful clerks" provide a "smooth and personable service.'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'A veritable powerhouse of IP expertise'
Chambers and Partners 2011
'excellence on IT matters'
Legal 500 (Information Technology) 2010
Beechwood House Publishing (t/a Binleys) v Guardian Products [2011] EWPCC 22
Case Summary | Judgment | 20 June 2011
Jonathan Hill acted for the successful claimant in the trial of a database right infringement claim brought by a supplier of healthcare data against a competitor which had obtained and used data taken from the claimant’s database. The case involved the first application by the English courts of the European Court of Justice’s guidance in the British Horseracing Board v William Hill Organisation case as to the principles applicable when assessing whether a substantial part of a database has been taken - the key question when it comes to establishing infringement. HHJ Birss QC provided useful guidance as to how to go about the assessment from both a quantitative and qualitative point of view and his findings provide a useful yardstick as to the amount of data which needs to be taken for infringement to result. [2011] EWPCC 22.

